The Punch after the Jab
I have been asked by many concerned friends and family about my opinion
on the COVID vaccine and if I plan on getting vaccinated. 1 know many who
have already received their vaccination and were eager to do so. Everyone
has their own reasons why they agreed to this prevention strategy and how
they may feel satisfied with their decision. As for me, based on my own
reasoning, I do not have any intention to receive a COVID vaccination. 1 will
elaborate about my concerns behind my own opinion which will be
discussed here. This topic is not to push any “conspiracy theories” but solely
based on my own clinical understanding of the COVID vaccination.
Reasons for why I will decline the COVID Vaccine:
The COVID vaccine is unlike other vaccines
(1) The COVID vaccine is the first “Flu-like” vaccine to use messenger RNA
(mRNA) to stimulate an immune response in our cells as a protective
strategy. Typical seasonal flu shots given annually is a vaccine with an
attenuated virus (live, but rendered benign or dead virus). It follows the
same process our body behaves after we are infected by a virus. Eventually,
when our body identifies the viral intruder, it is digested by special cells
which submit pieces to other “policing cell” in order to alert your body about
the unique protein coat of the invading virus Once our body knows what the
protein coat looks like, our body generates antibodies to give us protection.
Why we have to get a flu vaccine every year
(2) Each year when the seasonal flu begins to spread through the nation the
protein coat of the flu virus attempts to invade our body by its capacity to
change its coat through the variability provided in its own genetic code. This
makes the virus appear different to our body every year from the previous
year as to escape detection. The Flu shot gives our body an early detection
advantage by providing fragment proteins that make up the coat of the recent
virus. Since our cells recognize the coat protein as foreign our body can learn
how the virus will be coated without having to be infected by the actual virus.
Our defense system will already be prepared to target the live virus if it tries
to invade our body. Such prevention steps are especially beneficial to reduce
high-risk complications for those who have a weakened immune system and
The nature of novel COVID mRNA vaccines
(3) Unlike the “Flu shot” where a foreign protein triggers our body to form
antibodies to alert our body ahead of a likely viral attack, the COVID vaccine
uses messenger RNA (mRNA) to instruct our cells to create the very protein
our body is supposed to target.
The genetic fragment is considered the ‘menu sequence” to make the
“spike protein” unique to the coat of the Coronavirus. Our bodies routinely
use mRNA to form the many types of proteins we need in our bodies. The
mRNA is the instruction released from our DNA from inside the command
center of the cell’s nucleus. Outside of the nucleus, it gets carried to the
“building factory” that is stationed in the backyard within the cell. It is
the same way that our body replaces skin, tendons, enzymes, etc.. the COVID Vax
mRNA also presents instructions to our cells to build their own protein.
But this protein is specific for making the same “viral spike” protein that our
bodies are supposed to identify as “foreign” for our body to target.
The problem of “Spike” proteins
(4) Is the Spike gene template even accurate? This whole strategy is based on
the belief that the gene code for the spike protein of the coronavirus is actually
the correct code that accurately identifies the protein claimed. Some earlier
reports from skeptical geneticists questioned the validity of this code that was
provided from China (the original source of this pandemic). Others have even
questioned if the code was a partial sample or if the transport of the sample
gene was completely intact for controlled transport to our lab for the
development of vaccines. Genetic fragments are notoriously unstable over
a short duration of time. Knowing that only a few samples were used as a
template for making vaccines, it would take an act of faith to believe the
template is exactly the same as the original “spike” code identified.
The problem of targeting foreign proteins
(5) The concern of methodology in having our cells create their own antigens
(a) The “foreign” particle (or antigen) introduced into our body from regular
vaccines are introduced into our tissues and get released into our bloodstream
OUTSIDE our cells, where they encounter policing cells from our immune
system. After a foreign material is engulfed and destroyed, special cells present
fragments on its surface to other cells like “show and tell”. This is where more
aggressive cells learn what the foreign agent looks like. However, the mRNA
from these novel vaccines enter INTO the cells and bypass all the normal
digesting process, and are escorted straight to the cell’s factory to begin making
the “foreign” protein. So, think about that a moment. We are not exposed to a
foreign protein to train our immune system. We are actually making the very
protein we are supposed to regard as “foreign”. This already throws up red flags
for me. If our cells are making the target proteins which are to be destroyed, how
long would it be before our intelligent immune system will begin attacking the
cells that make the “foreign” protein?
Spike Proteins and ACE Receptors
(b) It has been discovered early in the pandemic that the COVID “spike” protein
enters our cells by binding to particular proteins known as ACE receptors. This
implies that the structure of the protein spikes of COVID bear similarity to that of
ACE receptors. We have a great number of ACE receptors that help regulate our
bodily functions and they are embedded on a number of our membranes like our
heart, lungs, and the digestive system naturally. This brings me to the next
concern. If we tell our cells to make a “foreign” protein that our immune
system is to attack, what would happen if that training cross-reacted with our
own normal ACE receptors? It would have the potential for other
Now, think about some of the problematic symptoms related to those who
have been vaccinated by the mRNA vaccine. Do any of these side effects have
anything to do with the heart, the lungs or digestive system? Yes, there
seems to be a pattern.
Is our DNA really safe?
(c) As stated, our cells are often making necessary proteins routinely. The
operation is dictated by the “control center” of our cells within the nucleus,
where the DNA provides all information which a cell will follow. The mRNA
is released to the backyard factory where the menu is placed for a protein
building in the cytoplasm. Yet, in some cells and in certain necessary situations,
the DNA is able to make changes for cells to adapt to new modifications if
needed. But for this to take place, those special cells are provided a feedback
passage to reenter the nucleus to allow some regulation based on what the
needs require. This special enzyme is known as Reverse transcriptase. It allows
for the mRNA in certain cells to directly return back through the nucleus and
contribute program changes back to the DNA, the control center of the cell.
(d) The science journals always seem to cover how the mRNA introduced into
our cells is not able to alter our DNA itself. Journalists share how the insertion
of mRNA does not contain the necessary program to produce reverse
transcriptase, required to rewrite changes back to the DNA. However, no one
seems to mention the possibility that some cells may already have reverse
transcriptase in their cytoplasm while carrying out other functions. If this
enzyme does exist in the cytoplasm, what prevents the mRNA from being
transported back to the nucleus and altering the DNA?
(6) There are reasons for concern if mRNA could code into our DNA. It would
really depend on where mRNA gets inserted.
(a) Our DNA is very condensed and it is a coiled bundle of information. The
only cells that do not have DNA within their internal environment are the red
cells. Red cells dump their own DNA soon after it is formed so as to leave more
room for its role to carry and deliver oxygen throughout our body where it is
needed. All the other cells in our body have the DNA program retained within
the nuclei where their role will be determined by the select segment of DNA
it reads, their assigned regions to know what function they are to perform
and all the regulating conditions to perform for their role.
DNA instructions are specific
(b) The portions of DNA to which each cell is assigned are ‘pre-scripted to
make all the necessary organelles, enzymes and substrates necessary for their
particular function. These regions in the DNA code have “start, stop, and
regulatory” instructions. Now imagine if a foreign code is inserted between
a start and stop region. What could result? It would clearly alter the operation
of the cell. In such situations, it may prevent a necessary role of the cell,
prevent the cell’s normal development, or even permit cell growth without
having the needed instruction to end a growth phase.
(c) When a cell is no longer regulated as it was designed to function it
compromises the life of the cell. When cells are instructed to up-regulate
without limits, it is often what we refer to as cancer. The tissue proliferates
and develops a particular cell line or tissue that the body sees as itself. When
there is no regulatory control of cell growth it often does not get stopped but
permitted by our body to grow beyond normal boundaries often reducing other
needed cell or tissue lines. This is when cancer metastasizes.
How do we answer to the appearance of success of the mRNA vaccines?
(7) What about the many vaccinated people who seem to have developed
immunity successfully? I would like to believe that many people have been
given immunity protection aligned with the intended goal of the vaccine. But
there is no way to be certain of how effective the mRNA vaccine will prove to be.
Let’s consider what we mean by “vaccine success”
(a) If we define vaccine success by the level of protection it provides, we
may have problems. Reports have been surfacing of vaccinated individuals
who are having recurrences of COVID infections at an even higher rate
than those who were not vaccinated. There have been some researchers
who claim that the spikes our cells generate due to the vaccine, may in fact
provide more targets for reinfection by the Coronavirus. It has even been
reported that cell-generated spikes become lodged in healthy tissues,
which impair the optimal functions. Further, there have been claims
made by some doctors that vaccinated people shed protein spikes
which may put others at risk. One report stated that child-bearing women
have had more ob-gyn problems when exposed to others who have received
the vaccine, including higher rates of ovarian cysts and irregular periods.
We may need to begin questioning if our treatments are actually helping us
or hurting us.
(b) What is not being explored is the number of people who may have already
developed immunity without receiving a vaccine. Just take a look at the
numbers who have not been vaccinated in states where ‘masks are no longer
mandated’. Why is the mortality still lower than other “mask mandated” areas?
(c) Why are the reported numbers of infected individuals going down/up?
After the inauguration of Biden, there was a ‘sudden discovery’ of how
spinning a sample too long in the “PCR” tests tends to make many false –
positive results such as it did earlier when people were tested for COVID.
The CDC later presented new findings that if a sample was tested through
a higher rate of spins a sample would yield a false-positive result. (This
contributed to the belief why people could test positive but would
not have any symptoms of illness). Upon changing the standards of testing
conditions, the result identified far fewer true ‘OVID-infected people.
“Miraculously”, this new standard was clarified only after a new
administration was “elected”, that falsely associated the new administration
with ‘improved’ handling of the pandemic.
The instability of a virus
(8) The nature of any novel virus in its first generation will always prove more
potent and dangerous than subsequent generations. Viruses do not get stronger
with time or repeated replication of the spread rate. They become less potent and
less harmful with time.
(a) Viruses are not built for stability. Each duplication of viral particles within
infected cells tends to be less stable just due to their lack of solid replication. Over
time they develop more errors in their code and become more vulnerable to
attack. That fact by itself, assures that the longer a duration of viral replication
and the more it spreads will ultimately lead to its own self-limiting termination.
(9) The Coronavirus is not some mysterious virus that many may think. In fact,
many people have already been exposed to the natural Coronavirus sometime
in their life as it often occurs in nature. Many people often develop immunity at
some point in their lifetime naturally.
Validity of the Spike template
(a) Many believe COVID could not have occurred as a natural phenomenon: it
could not have formed randomly in nature without some outside and purposed
laboratory modification. “This explains how many can already have evidence of
antibodies in their blood from the natural pre-exposure to preexisting infection
much earlier and yet not have any signs of being actively infected, or may have
had very minimal symptoms. For some people, COVID can become quite fatal.
Given that there are reports of “new stains” occurring, but knowing novel
viruses grow less potent and less harmful over time we may be dealing with
possible different new lab-modified strain.
(b) A primary concern lies at the foundation of where this vaccine manufacturing
all began. Evidence suggests that the fragment used as the template for the
COVID vaccine was based on limited and unverified samples of COVID
fragments from China, whereby all the labs have manufactured a vaccine.
Reports state that due to the political strife with China, we were unable to
verify the fragment as authentic. Even now, China refuses to take
responsibility for how it may have contributed to this pandemic. The sudden
confidence for an effective treatment has not had the luxury of a time-based
review for efficacy, the sad reality is that those receiving the vaccine are in
essence the true experimental group in this treatment design. We may not
know the impact of this “treatment” and the inherent risks it carries for years
It was truly a miraculous feat for President Trump to orchestrate the
efforts of our pharmaceuticals and scientific community to prepare vaccines
in record time. The President even by his own admission is not a scientist and
he brought all available services and great minds to bear and this COVID
pandemic. However, I have significant questions about the methodology of
using a genetic modifying strategy and I lack professional confidence of those
behind this vaccination strategy. Why forego on tried and true flu vaccine efforts
that were successful and given annually. I am also concerned about those who
push gene therapies without weighing the potential harm that may result
from this effort.
How can we assume a successful treatment without having proper methods
to explore significant risks? Based on my medical studies and education, this
genetic modifying approach introduces many doubts and concerns. As more
healthcare personnel are asking more questions we find the answers are
neither forthcoming, factual, or inconsistent with established medical knowledge.
Greg E. Williams, MD
protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens.
.Wikipedia org/wiki/Angotensin-conver Contributors for Wikimedia projects
20 Sep 2005 17:24:52 Wikimedia Foundation.
The spectrum of Neurological Manifestations in Covid-19: A Review: gs:
/Pubmed ncn NIH gov 32643664 01Jun 2020, 5:00:00 May-Jun 2020
group of related viruses that cause diseases in mammals and birds https//Wikipedia org/wiki Coronavirus
Contributors fo Wikimedia projects 27 Mar 2003 10:12:20 Wikimedia Foundation, In species of viruses
tpn. Wikipedia org wiki/Human_coronavirus_NL63 Contributors to Wikimedia projects
04 Jan 2006 14:40:27 Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Is it true? Can COVID-19 vaccines alter my DNA?
class of medications.
en Wikipedia org WIKVRNA therapeutics Contributors to Wikimedia projects
01’5¢p2020 18:03:37 Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Influenza Vaccination: Prevent the Flu with Vaccination —
Epidemiology https://www.vdh.virginia.gov/epidemiology/influenza-flu-in-virginia/infiuenza vaccination-prevent-